It’s not that they’re an afterthought or a profitable side line;
rather, they’re a spasmodic and unpreventable release of the latent
enthusiasm that builds up when you are forced, for very good reasons, to
spend most of the year grinding out Avensises and Aurises.
The discontinued Lexus LFA,
a money-losing masterpiece that could not perhaps have been built
anywhere else, is the most obvious example of this cathartic approach
(although the current Toyota GT86, an extraordinary attempt to hotwire a niche concern into a mainstream offering, must run it close).
The
IS F, though, predates them both. The four-door saloon, introduced in
2007, was more obvious territory for Lexus, but it was still conceived
and developed in a way that made it seem more like muscle spasm than
cast-iron range inclusion. It drove that way, too, being amusing and
wayward and worrying in divertingly unequal measure.
The newer, fewer-doored Lexus RC F,
our reason for assembling the cars that you see above, is an indirect
descendant of that car – chiefly through its 5.0-litre V8 petrol engine.
In
Europe, the repeat appearance of so many atmosphere-munching cylinders
has provoked a collective raising of the eyebrows, most of them
questioning the need for quite so much cubic capacity when the
opposition – namely BMW and Mercedes-Benz – are now extracting more from significantly less.
Such
dubiousness is valid, of course, if a little Eurocentric. Lexus is
using the V8 not because it’s a warbling throwback, but because it’s the
Euro 6-compliant global engine available, it being a tricked-up version
of the unit that is slid into more humble fare, often with electric
motors attached. This is why it can be made to function on the
fuel-sipping (and gently power-sapping) Atkinson cycle, should you wish
to attempt to draw the quoted 26.2mpg out of its hat.
Read the full BMW M4 review
Since
the IS F, it has been revised again, mostly to make it rev higher and
harder, producing yet more power along the way. The resultis the most
powerful road-going Lexus V8 yet – the marketing department’s way of
saying that it’s 54bhp perkier than before.
That, at least,
compares favourably with the competition, a Germanic collective that is
bisected by the RC F in terms of engine technology. On one hand, there’s
the new BMW M4, torch-carrier for a future generation of cars dependent on forced induction.
On the other, there’s the Audi RS5,a leftover from the soon-to-be-extinct era when it was deemed okay to
mount a supercar’s engine over the front axle and holler out “finished”
to the rest of the factory. The M4 develops 425bhp and the RS5 444bhp,
leaving the RC F, at 471bhp, looking even more muscle-bound than its
many bulges already suggest.
Each, though, will do 0-62mph in
about 4.5sec, seat four people in relative comfort and set you back the
best part of £60k. Their designers shared a style guide, too, each being
a different version of the same raked, narrow-eyed, cold-shouldered
brute. The eldest, the RS5, has a certain Q-car subtlety about it.
The
newest is a Japanese Brillo pad of ideas, some half finished, others
overplayed, still more just stuck on for fun. Visually, it rears up at
you like a manga trailer. Most likely, it suits neon and steam, not the
investigative white light of the Peak District.
Inside, it swerves
so violently back to the straight and narrow that you’d think the right
hand missed a memo from the left. Lexus, apparently oblivious to
Jonathan Ives’ plasmatic revolution, builds interiors as though it were
working to a 1970s Xerox R&D blueprint.
There must be 30
buttons on the RC F’s centre console to go with a brusquely gated gear
selector and, yes, a touch-sensitive mouse pad. Everything slots
together as though it has all been machined from a single
three-metre-square cube of high-grade plastic, and everything is done
better – prettier, suaver, sleeker – in both of its European rivals.
Switched
on, warmed over and driven in the default condition of many, many
modes, each car telegraphs a different take on what expensively rendered
normality should feel like.
Read the full Lexus RC F review
The
RS5, defined by its supreme Audiness even late on in its lifecycle,
still girdles you in an unyielding pressure chamber of refinement. On
passive dampers, it rides with a thick-necked stubbornness and steers
with brooding intent. It feels nose-heavy and tacked to the planet like a
continental shelf. It would be a boorish nuisance if there wasn’t so
much effervescence shimmering off the 4.2-litre V8’s 1-5-4-8-6-3-7-2
firing sequence.
This, surely, was the engine on Lexus’s
benchmarking spreadsheet – the reason for its new titanium valves and
forged conrods and that higher 7300rpm limit. The Audi unit, peppered
with the nonchalant blips and clicks of its quick-witted seven-speed
dual-clutch automatic gearbox, goes farther around the rev counter by
almost 1000rpm, every last speck of it in a distant fuel-stratifying
trill of moving parts. It is that rare and special sort of motor which
has you pondering the remarkable stresses it must be under without ever
considering its preservation.
In the M4, on the same damp
hillside, your thoughts are more likely to turn to the welfare of your
own internals. The rear axle is rebellious to the point of outright
silliness in poor weather. Blithe throttle inputs of the size swallowed
by the quattro drivetrain will have the back end trying to overtake the
front, a tendency even repeated between the pugnacious, head-nodding
manual shifts of BMW’s more aggressive seven-speed M DCT.
Such
overt waywardness can only be intentional – part of M division’s grand
scheme to ensure that its most famous son cannot be accused of
detachment or dullness. Better that it growl and spit like a
risk-inclined mongrel occasionally if that’s what it takes to stage
manage the right kind of instinctive directional energy.
This it
manufactures in prodigious quantities, partly via a typically direct
steering rack and its lighter, better balanced kerb weight, and partly
through the viciousness located beyond the bulkhead.
There’s no
aerated V8 fizz here, but rather a spooled-up industrial retort from
what can only be described as a glowering petrol generator of a
3.0-litre straight six. Its turbos are twofold, dinky and intended not
to hinder an engine that revs, via its own set of exotic components, to
well beyond 7000rpm. That’s despite forced induction. The benefits of it
are felt much sooner, most obviously in the savage 406lb ft of torque
that it belches onto the road from 1850rpm.
It is this rip tide of
coercion – summoned from less than half the crank speed of its rivals –
along with the 30mpg-plus the M4 returns on the motorway that threatens
to sweep the atmospheric V8 into superfluousness.
The RC F
certainly has no answer. Driven modestly, it is treacly by comparison,
defaulting to a baritone and gentlemanly obedience below 4000rpm.
There’s a hint of waft, even, helped along by the nebulous upshifts from
the only conventional automatic present and a throttle that’s
apparently indifferent to the first few inches of pedal travel.
It
can’t quite match this coyness in the suspension, where the rebound is a
little too eager to keep the car on an even keel, despite the bony
repercussions. But it is a considerate package, nevertheless – less
alert, more hospitable. Imperiously Lexus, then.
Read the full Audi RS5 review
To
cast off the stateliness, one must either cycle through the four drive
modes or else bring your size nine down to meet the nylon shag. Either
way, somewhere in the mid-range, the exhaust, or the speaker beneath the
instrument cluster frantically channelling the exhaust, finds its voice
– and the new valves, injection system and cylinder head finally show
their worth.
The needle’s sprint up to the redline isn’t as
riotously quick as in the RS5, nor the thrust that accompanies it on par
with the M4’s, but the V8’s climactic roar is almost as compelling
because of the sense of heft that comes with it – like feeling the
ground shake beneath a charging rhino. Transferred to the wider asphalt
of Blyton Park circuit, the RC F is the one car here that feels as
though it could use the space of the long back straight to expend its
full, long-legged potential.
In some measure, that is the
shortcoming of the eight-speed auto ’box, which really must be shifted
manually if you don’t want to wait for the old-fashioned delay of an
elastic-band kickdown. But mostly, it’s the fault of the coupé’s kerb
weight, a 1765kg millstone (minus driver) that somehow manages to make
the extra mechanicals of Audi’s all-wheel-drive car appear
undernourished. The RC F carries this extra mass around a track
conspicuously, making it more numb and less wieldy than it deserves to
be.
The nervous system beneath the fatty tissue is clearly
functional, though. Squat and appreciably more adherent than the M4, the
car makes the most of its firm chassis and can be cornered with the
kind of confidence that comes from knowing the front will start hinting
at you before the back gives up. Optionally, there’s a torque-vectoring
differential to help smooth the transition from neutrality to
tyre-spinning excess, a state that it handles with manageable panache.
The verdict
The
RC F's adjustability and briskly fluent steering almost has it pip the
RS5 in the final running order, especially given the inordinately
massive lift-off required to have the Audi reconcile itself with a new
line. But the RC F’s ultimate inability to satisfy at either end of its
changeable nature – not as a big-chested GT or flat-out thrill seeker –
dooms it to Toyota’s catalogue of nice ideas rather than its shortlist
of unmitigated triumphs.
The RS5, certainly at Blyton, isn’t any
more lovable. It is, as you would expect, plainer, stickier and faithful
to the point of brute force. It won’t have you yearning for another lap
or desperate to find the keys in your pocket when it’s all over,
either. And yet, unlike the Lexus, it has one virtuoso aspect in that
princely V8. It also has the means to deploy it, one not dependent on
the weather, time of day or even a basic level of attention.
Although,
if you get the chance, we’d advise you to sit up straight; there’s a
man in Ingolstadt right now plotting this engine’s demise – and when
it’s gone, there won’t be another like it.
There will be more like
the M4, though, and that’s fine. Its laps rumble through the memory in a
sweaty blur. But then there were a lot of them. The car is, at once,
tenacious, tiring and ballistic. Even in drier conditions, the limits of
its traction are not typically progressive.
The uptight diff
makes the rear end a twangy affair, and although the chassis telegraphs
it plainly enough, it doesn’t make for an easy-going experience. It is
an invigorating one, though, and that’s largely the point.
Much
about the BMW – its steroidal engine, vociferous soundtrack, delinquent
handling bias and so on – is an instant fix, each made so immoderate
that you could access them on your driveway. Flagrant hedonism doesn’t
make it perfect all the way around, but, boy, is it a coupé for our
times.
BMW M4 Coupe
Price £61,475; Engine 6 cylinders, inline, 2987cc, petrol, twin-turbo; Power 425bhp at 5500-7300rpm; Torque 406lb ft at 1850-5500rpm; Gearbox 7-spd dual-clutch auto; Kerb weight 1572kg; Top speed 155mph (limited); 0-62mph 4.3sec; Economy 34mpg; CO2/tax band 194g/km, 32 per cent
Audi RS5 Coupe
Price £59,870; Engine 8 cylinders, V-formation, 4163cc, petrol; Power 444bhp at 8250rpm; Torque 317lb ft at 4000-6000rpm; Gearbox 7-spd dual-clutch suto; Kerb weight 1715kg; Top speed 155mph (limited); 0-62mph 4.5sec; Economy 26.9mpg; CO2/tax band 246g/km, 35 per cent
Lexus RC F
Price £60,995; Engine 8 cylinders, V-formation, 4969cc, petrol; Power 471bhp at 7300rpm; Torque 391lb ft at 4800-5600rpm; Gearbox 8-spd auto; Kerb weight 1765kg; Top speed 155mph (limited); 0-62mph 4.5sec; Economy 26.2mpg; CO2/tax band 252g/km, 35 per cent
No comments:
Post a Comment